Eight drugs doctors would never take
Would doctors take the medications they prescribe to their patients? Not necessarily, if a recent article in Men′s Health is any indication (1). A number of physicians were asked which drugs they themselves would refuse to take. Here is their list:
- Asthma drug Advair
- Diabetes drug Avandia
- Pain reliever Celebrex (a relative of the infamous Voixx)
- Antibiotic Ketek
- Heartburn medication Prilosec
- Heartburn medication Nexium
- Eye drops Visine Original
- Decongestant Pseudoephedrin
I first came across this list on Dr. Mercola′s site (2). Here is the beginning of his commentary:
"Seemingly positive and helpful articles like these really highlight how pervasive the conventional drug culture is. Although these drugs are exposed as being dangerous and best avoided at all costs, the writer failed miserably in providing ′healthier′ alternatives; in all cases but two, merely citing alternative drug treatments …" (2)
Actually it was the doctors who failed miserably; the writer just quoted the doctors′ recommendations. Mercola then goes on to comment on three of the drugs on this list — the asthma, diabetes and heartburn / acid reflux medications — and suggests non-pharmaceutical alternatives. I′ll restrict my own comments to Avandia.
In May of 2007 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety alert on Avandia (3):
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is aware of a potential safety issue related to Avandia (rosiglitazone), a drug approved to treat type 2 diabetes …" (3)
The agency goes on to say that safety data from some controlled clinical trials showed a potential increase in the risk of heart attacks, but other data provided contradictory evidence. The agency then issues this warning to patients on Avandia:
"Patients who are taking Avandia, especially those who are known to have underlying heart disease or who are at high risk of heart attack should talk to their doctor about this new information as they evaluate the available treatment options for their type 2 diabetes." (3)
Why didn′t the FDA just mandate the removal of the drug from the market?
"FDA′s analyses are ongoing. FDA has not confirmed the clinical significance of the reported increased risk in the context of other studies. Pending questions include whether the other approved treatment from the same class of drugs, pioglitazone, has less, the same or greater risks. Furthermore, there is inherent risk associated with switching patients with diabetes from one treatment to another even in the absence of specific risks associated with particular treatments. For these reasons, FDA is not asking GlaxoSmithKline, the drug′s sponsor, to take any specific action at this time." (3)
If changing treatments poses such a significant health risk, why advise patients to talk to their doctors about their available treatment options, i.e. about switching drugs? And exactly what was the information available to the agency that made it so difficult for them to make a decision?
"Recently, the manufacturer of Avandia (GlaxoSmithKline) provided FDA with a pooled analysis (meta analysis) of 42 randomized, controlled clinical trials in which Avandia was compared to either placebo or other anti-diabetic therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. The pooled analysis suggested that patients receiving short-term (most studies were 6 months duration) treatment with Avandia may have a 30-40 percent greater risk of heart attack and other heart-related adverse events than patients treated with placebo or other anti-diabetic therapy. These data, if confirmed, would be of significant concern since patients with diabetes are already at an increased risk of heart disease." (3)
Of significant concern? Can you imagine a natural health product remaining on the market with a rap sheet like that. Does the pharmaceutical industry control the FDA, or what?
The sad thing about all of this is that type 2 diabetes is considered a life style disease that is both preventable and reversible. The American Diabetes Association readily admits this:
"People with diabetes have the same nutritional needs as anyone else. Along with exercise and medications (insulin or oral diabetic pills), nutrition is important for good diabetes control. By eating well-balanced meals in the correct amounts, you can keep your blood glucose levels as close to normal (non-diabetic level) as possible." [emphasis added] (4)
Pharmaceutical intervention shouldn′t even be necessary in type 2 diabetes. Yet the drug peddling continues, with the active participation of the medical establishment.
Sources:
- Morgan Lord. 8 Drugs doctors would never take. If they don't use these medications, why should you? Men's Health June 22, 2008. [Full Text]
- Dr. Mercola. 8 Drugs doctors would never take. Mercola.com July 10, 2008. [Full Text]
- FDA issues safety alert on Avandia, May 21, 2007. [Full Text]
- Nutrition & Recipes. American Diabetes Association. [Quote]


The idea of taking any kind of drug regularly makes me queasy! I can't believe women take birth control pills regularly and that other people take medication regularly instead of looking to fix the problem at the root! The human body is naturally a perfect system. It is very complex and may never be understood to the "-nth degree." Natural health is always the best resource.
Many conditions are treatable with simply a change in diet or the introduction of natural">www.natural-green-guide.com/natural-detox.html">natural detox.
Reply to this
I, too, shudder at the thought of frequent chemical drug ingestion. I am in total agreement that we should always look to get to the root of health conditions and harness">http://www.all4naturalhealth.com/natural-health-alternatives.html">harness the body's amazing ability to heal itself.
Reply to this